View single post by Judson Manning
 Posted: 11-05-2008 01:16 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Judson Manning



Joined: 03-14-2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia USA
Posts: 406
Status: 
Offline
The 907 was dubbed the 'torqueless wonder' and IMHO that was due to the relatively low c/r and the stock cams having just way too much duration. 

Greg is correct in that a cost effective rebuild would re-use the 8.4 pistons assuming the liners are in good shape.  The 'development' engine in my E-Prod car is a freshened 8.4 with touched-up liners and new rings.  ~$1000 in savings.  Alternatively, if the liners need more than ~.003" machining then new pistons are in order.  With modern gas able to handle well over 10:1 c/r, it's kind of a waste to purchase new 8.4 pistons given the performance increase. 

From a cam perspective Lotus progressively dropped the duration and overlap with the introduction of the E and 107 cams to boost torque.  The dyno results I have from John Cronin's 2.0 with dual 107 cams and 104LC show a wide and flat torque curve with HP peaking at 5,750rpm - perfect for a street car. 

In the quest to run up to 8000rpm the problem is the mains holding enough pressure to feed the rod bearings.  The stock main bearings have a wide and shallow groove with a big hole in the middle - just like a rain tire!  To spin that high it's necessary to upgrade to the plain bottom bearings (Esprit or Chrysler) with a cross-drilled crank so that oil film can work undisturbed.

Judson